Interview with Glen Craney, Author of The Cotillion Brigade

A personal note

The sultry air in Earlham makes it a labor to walk.  I’m reminded of the humidity at my grandparent’s house in northern Florida.  Middle-aged men would walk and talk in slow motion, mopping their brows with wrinkled handkerchiefs.  At least in Florida, I could slip into bathing trunks and hot-foot it down a scorching sand path to the lake.  Now I’m one of those middle-aged men.  Thank God for the 20th-Century blessing of air conditioning. 

I am returning to this blog — but with a twist.  I plan to post my interviews with historians and historical novelists.  In addition, I’ll occasionally write articles about topics related to the Iowa Underground Railroad; Iowa Confederates; dissent and the violation of civil liberties; and Iowa during wartime. 

To kick off this new feature, I invite you to read my interview with Glen Craney, author of The Cotillion Brigade:  A Novel of the Civil War and the Most Famous Female Militia in American History.  (The interview first ran on The Historical Novel Society website.)   

INTERVIEW BY DAVID CONNON

Lawyer and screenwriter Glen Craney recently published his first Civil War novel, The Cotillion Brigade

What is your “elevator pitch”?

Georgia burns. Sherman’s Yankees are closing in. Will the women of LaGrange run or fight? The Cotillion Brigade is based on the true Civil War story of the Nancy Harts, the most famous female militia in American history, and the Union colonel whose life they changed forever. “Gone With the Wind meets A League of Their Own.”

What inspired you to start writing?  And how does your occupational background affect your writing? 

I came to historical fiction later in life.  As a law clerk for state appellate and federal district judges, I researched and drafted legal opinions.  Private trial practice didn’t feed my creative side, so I attended Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism.  After covering national politics and the Iran-Contra trial for Congressional Quarterly, I moved to Los Angeles to pen movie scripts.  My first screenplay — about the Navajo Code Talkers in World War Two – won a prize.  My mentor, the legendary Hollywood screenwriter Harry Essex, encouraged me to “shake out” some novels from my period scripts.  My former writing careers—legal, journalism, screenplay— have helped me research and create historical novels.

What attracted you to writing historical fiction? 

I caught the history bug as a boy. A great-uncle lived in Harrodsburg, Kentucky, where Daniel Boone and George Rogers Clark had defended the blood-soaked ground.   He also took me to the nearby Civil War battlefield of Perryville and shared stories about his father, a Union Army captain who served there against his own brother, a Confederate cavalryman with Morgan’s Raiders.  The Cotillion Brigade is the first novel I’ve written about the Civil War.  It’s always been my favorite era.

Glen Craney

What is the backstory behind writing The Cotillion Brigade

In the late 1980s, I found a small-town Georgia newspaper column, describing the exploits of the Nancy Harts.  I tossed it into a clipping file.  Several years later, writing for Hollywood, I nearly sold the Nancy Harts saga as a movie to Hallmark Hall of Fame Productions.  The studio executive who championed the project left the company, and the clipping went back into the ideas file.  It took the Covid pandemic lockdown to give me the time to turn the story into a book.  I call it my plague novel.

Did you outline the entire book before you began writing it?

Yes, I did, scene by scene.  I’m a plotter by nature, and I plan in detail the structure of all my novels.  This habit comes from writing film scripts, whose story arcs, confined to 120 pages, must be tight and visual.  In The Cotillion Brigade’s first iteration as a movie treatment, I focused primarily on the LaGrange militia women.  Years later, rewriting the story as a novel, I added the experiences of Colonel Hugh LaGrange, the Union officer the women confronted.  The two plot lines led to the climactic ending.

What is the most difficult part of writing a novel that follows the chronology of historical events? 

The realities of history and the demands of storytelling often clash.  History is messy.  Important characters are not always in the same location together, as in a stage play, and pivot points and plot twists don’t always occur at the opportune moment for our compressed stories.  Dual timelines can help, but they are tricky.  If not executed deftly, they can result in a reader preferring one storyline while skimming the second.  Still, perceptive readers of historical fiction tend to be aware of these challenges and allow the author some leeway in deviating from traditional story-structure expectations to accommodate chronological accuracy. 

You write some vivid scenes.  For example, Uncle Gus describes the caning of Sen. Charles Sumner by striking his desk with his cane and breaking the desk.   Did you have a strategy for writing powerful scenes?   

I look for ways to dramatize back story and context, rather than drone on with “tell, not show.”  Clever classroom teachers do the same.  Because of Gus’s reenactment, the female students in that scene—and, I hope, the reader—will not soon forget the violence of the Sumner caning and the Southern reaction.

Which character challenged you the most?

The Confederate women presented a conundrum.  I knew I had to write the Nancy Harts story; it wouldn’t let go of me.  Yet for the first time, I suffered writer’s block.  I struggled with how to depict as empathetic those who defended a society built upon an immoral institution.  How would I convince readers to root for them?  I have no patience with the Lost Cause ideology.  I aimed to avoid glorifying the Lost Cause or sidestepping the importance and depravity of slavery.  I also tried to portray the characters making choices and facing the consequences of those choices. 

What led you to include prominent historical figures in your book, including John Brown, Jim Lane, and Jefferson Davis?

They leapt out at me from the research. Hugh LaGrange, as a young Free-Soiler, had brushes with both Brown and Lane, who were so eccentric that I felt certain they would have helped shape Hugh’s worldview.   Fortunately, the town of LaGrange sat on a major railway through Georgia to Montgomery, Alabama, and thus hosted many Confederate notables, including Jefferson Davis, a friend of LaGrange’s most prominent resident, Senator Ben Hill.

What reference book did you consult the most when writing The Cotillion Brigade?

Regrettably, Nancy Morgan and Hugh LaGrange left no memoirs or diaries, only a few dozen letters.  Much of my primary research came from the archives of their contemporaries.  I gained the most insight into Colonel LaGrange’s personality from his military reports published in The War of the Rebellion (AKA Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies).

What did you learn while writing this book?

I hadn’t fully appreciated the devastating effect the war had on the social fabric of both Northern and Southern societies. Divorce was still very much frowned upon, but many soldiers’ marriages failed. To my astonishment, I found several instances of Southern women agreeing to marriage proposals from Union soldiers after knowing their former enemies for only a few weeks.

Can you recommend a book about writing historical fiction?

I suggest reading accomplished historical novelists, such as Sharon Kay Penman, Nigel Tranter, and Bernard Cornwell.  Don’t try to imitate them.  Learn their techniques and keep your own style.

What is your next project?

I have a long list of possibilities, but the Muse has yet to tap me on the shoulder with my next assignment.

*  *  *

Thank you for reading my blog.  If you enjoyed this post, please subscribe to this blog and “like” my Facebook page.  And please leave any comments and questions below. 

David Connon

David Connon has spent nearly two decades researching dissenters in Iowa: Grinnell residents who helped on the Underground Railroad, and their polar opposites, Iowa Confederates. He shares some of these stories with audiences across the state through the Humanities Iowa Speakers Bureau. He worked as an interpreter at Living History Farms for eleven seasons. Connon is a member of Sons of Union Veterans, an associate member of Sons of Confederate Veterans, and a member of the Des Moines Civil War Round Table. His articles have appeared in Iowa Heritage Illustrated, Iowa History Journal, Illinois Magazine, and local newspapers in both states.

This Post Has 2 Comments

  1. I found your interview with Mr. Glen Craney quite interesting and informative. It seems he’s had a fascinating career. However, I have to disagree with this statement: “ I struggled with how to depict as empathetic those who defended a society built upon an immoral institution.” That seems like an overstatement, as the majority of southerners did not defend slavery. That goes for many northerners as well. I understand he may have been addressing today’s misconception of why the Civil War was fought.

    1. Hi, Julie. It is a complicated topic, and you make a good point. It seems that when one considers various aspects of the Civil War (and why it was fought), one encounters a “yes, but” situation. For example, let us accept that most southerners did not explicity join the Confederate Army to defend slavery. But did many of those men support politicians who defended slavery (or who advocated extending slavery into the Territories)? And then one might consider to what extent slavery was a topic in southern pulpits and southern newspapers before and during the war. (In other words, how did slavery affect public discourse and the emotional climate in southern states?) These questions could be extended by asking to what extent slavery impacted the economic well-being of Southern states. Equally complex questions arise when studying northerners before and during the war.

      Perhaps the complexity of the issues are part of the reason why people still disagree about the Civil War more than 150 years after the war ended. Thanks for weighing in with a thoughtful contribution.

Comments are closed.

Close Menu