The Architect of Andersonville Prison: A son’s quest to clear his father’s name

Mass imprisonment and poor supplies at Andersonville led to horrible cases of starvation.  The War Department publicized photos of emaciated soldiers, giving Andersonville an infamous and enduring reputation.

Historian Arch Fredric Blakey wrote a biography of Confederate General John H. Winder, who was later blamed for Andersonville.  Blakey writes:

To rescue a villain from history – to overturn a historical myth – is a difficult task.[1]

William Sidney Winder (“Sidney”), one of General Winder’s sons, spent years after the war ended, trying to rehabilitate his father’s name.

Family life and the law

Sidney grew up in a slave-holding military family in various Southern towns.  After attending Columbian College near Washington, D.C., Sidney practiced law in Keokuk, Iowa, from 1857 to fall 1860, and then he was an attorney in Baltimore.

William Sidney Winder

Sidney’s family became divided as war loomed.  His father, a career military officer, wavered between remaining in the U.S. Army and serving the Confederacy.  Sidney intended to fight for Southern independence, and his older half-brother remained a captain in the U.S. Army.

After Fort Sumter, North Carolina seceded, and Sidney’s father, John H. Winder, resigned his commission “with great regret” and became a brigadier general in the provisional Confederate army.

Sidney also joined the Confederate forces.  He was promoted from 1st Lieutenant to Captain and Assistant Adjutant General, eventually serving on his father’s staff.

Prison administration

General Winder became inspector general of prisons in the Richmond area.  When hungry housewives broke into shops, General Winder helped President Jefferson Davis put down the Richmond Bread Riot.

General John H. Winder

Late in 1863, the prisons in Richmond were seriously overcrowded.  General John H. Winder sent Sidney to Georgia to locate a site for a prison for Union POWs.  That order led to the infamous Andersonville Prison.

Andersonville

Sidney and his father tried to build and operate a prison that was spacious and relatively healthy, unlike the horror that became Andersonville.  However, they failed.

Andersonville Prison

Conditions worsened when, in December 1864, the North refused to resume the cartel (the exchange of POWs).  Prison populations continued to increase, in spite of insufficient resources to feed, clothe, and care for them.

General Winder proposed that the Confederates parole POWs and send them home without exchange.  That would have alleviated the problems at Andersonville, but his superiors rejected the idea, calling it “worse than evil.”

General Winder died a few weeks later in on Feb. 6, 1865.  Sidney went to Richmond, planning to resign, but instead he was charged with guarding the Confederate treasury and archives after the fall of Richmond.

Guarding Confederate gold and archives

Sidney and eight other officers eventually reached the David Levy Yulee plantation in Florida on May 22, 1865 – twelve days after Jefferson Davis was captured.

Author Blakey writes:

The group decided to bury the archives on the Yulee grounds [and allotted] one-fourth of the gold to support of Mrs. Davis and her children; the rest they divided equally among themselves.  Each officer received gold sovereigns in the amount of $1,995.

The nine officers surrendered and were paroled.  Sidney eventually resumed his law practice.

Focus on POW camps

Even before Appomattox, historian Marouf Hasian Jr. writes, “Northern presses were filled with lurid tales of lurid tales of victims of dysentery, scurvy, and gangrene” at Andersonville and other prison camps.  Writer Susan Sontag writes that “photographs of skeletal prisoners held at Andersonville inflamed public opinion.”[2]

Since General Winder was dead, the logical person to blame for Andersonville was commander Captain Henry Wirz.  Captain Wirz was given a military tribunal and hanged.

An uphill battle

Sidney maintained that he and his father had never been cruel to prisoners.  He and an uncle struggled to clear his father’s name.

However, Union officials who controlled the captured Confederate archives did not cooperate.  Without original documents, it was impossible to refute Union accusations that General John H. Winder was a cold-blooded mass murderer.

Sidney spent more than 10 years in a quixotic quest.  His health deteriorated, and he eventually withdrew from the world.  He died on February 25, 1925.

# # #

Thank you for reading my blog.  Please leave any comments and questions below.

[1] Arch Fredric Blakey, General John H. Winder (Gainesville, FL.: 1990), xv.

[2] Marouf Hasian Jr., In the Name of Necessity:  Military Tribunals and the Loss of American Civil Liberties (Tuscaloosa, LA:  2005), 123; and Susan Sontag, quoted in Rea S. Hederman, Anthology:  Selected Essays from Thirty Years of the New York Review of Books (New York:  New York Review of Books, 2001), 106.

David Connon

David Connon has spent nearly two decades researching dissenters in Iowa: Grinnell residents who helped on the Underground Railroad, and their polar opposites, Iowa Confederates. He shares some of these stories with audiences across the state through the Humanities Iowa Speakers Bureau. He worked as an interpreter at Living History Farms for eleven seasons. Connon is a member of Sons of Union Veterans, an associate member of Sons of Confederate Veterans, and a member of the Des Moines Civil War Round Table. His articles have appeared in Iowa Heritage Illustrated, Iowa History Journal, Illinois Magazine, and local newspapers in both states.

This Post Has 12 Comments

  1. Union prison camps in the north were no better, and in some cases even worse, but the winners record the history and the stories which follow, they also do the judging as to who was evil and who was just doing his job.

    1. Hi, Steve. You make some good points, as usual. There is no question that Union prison camps were also bad, although some authors suggest that prisoners suffered varying degrees of deprivation in those camps.

  2. Fascinating as always, David. Your posts really bring out the human side of the story, and the costs to the individuals and their families in the decisions or actions they made – or didn’t make.

    1. Hi, Kathy.
      Thank you for your kind, insightful comment.

  3. I’m currently listening to the audio book (from LibriVox) of John L. Ransom’s “Andersonville Diary . . .”. I did just a little research online this week and found counter allegations that the officials at Andersonville simply didn’t have the rations or medical care necessary for the number of men imprisoned there. Also, that some Union Soldiers may have exaggerated the injuries to the health while in those camps to boost their pensions.

    The counter is Ransom’s diary entries detailing cruelty by many of the Andersonville guards as well as personal acts of cruelty by Wirtz that he personally observed.

    Also, one reason that I’ve heard for the Union’s end of prisoner exchanges is the Confederacy’s refusal to treat captured black soldiers equally with white ones.

    1. Hi, William. I appreciate your thoughtful comments. From what I’ve read, it’s possible that all of the things you mentioned had occurred. However, I haven’t read anything suggesting that any Union soldiers exaggerated the injuries to their health “while in those camps to boost their pensions.” Thanks for reading my blog.

  4. I can think of about 50 Confederates that should have been hung before Henry Wirz.

    1. Hi, Ian. It seems that apportioning blame is a tricky business. Thank you for reading my blog.

  5. That was a very interesting blog! I teach the Civil War in my US History class in Texas, and the students are always amazed at how obstinate both sides could be during the Civil War. This was a very informative read. Thanks for sharing.

    1. Hi, Jewellee. Thank you for your kind comments. It is interesting that your high school students are amazed at the obstinancy of both sides during the Civil War. Thank you for reading my blog.

  6. we are doing a documentary on a John winder historical marker that sits on the courthouse lawn of Salisbury M.d. The Film is about the conflict of the sign’s placement and race relations in the town it will debut in March 2018 at the Ocean city film festival.

    1. Hi, Torrez.

      That is very interesting. You have piqued my curiosity. Does my article complement what you discovered in your research? Do you anticipate that your documentary will be available online at any point? Thanks for thinking about my questions.

Comments are closed.

Close Menu